The Corporation

One of the best documentaries I've seen about the downfall of freedom in the United States was "The Corporation".   What I liked about it was how it showed that if a corporation was truly an actual 'person' as is deemed by English Admiralty Law, then it would be a complete and utter psychopath.  The only goal of corporations is to make as great of a profit as possible without any regard to whom it harms, or the moral cost associated with it.

Regardless, the idea that corporations are 'people' is a complete and total lie.  Corporations contain people, just as a nation or a city does, but that doesn't make a corporation a 'person' in and of itself.  As one person commented on Mitt Romney's propagandizing, "Corporations are not people.  Corporations are property.  Slavery was the legal fiction that a person is property.  Corporate 'personhood' is the legal fiction that property is a person."

I find this to be true.  Corporations are businesses created to make a profit for those who have invested in them. From my perspective, they are businesses designed to make money for greedy criminals who don't want to be held accountable for their actions.  It is these people who enslave others around the world while promoting and instituting corporate fascism have no conscious when it comes to stepping all over the God given rights of others in order to fulfill their 'duty' of making money.

The acceptance of the subversive Admiralty Law that deems individuals themselves as 'corporations' in order to hold them accountable to corporate law coupled with the complacency to hold corporations themselves accountable, has led to the downfall of the freedom of the people United States originally had.  Then again, I'm not so sure that we've ever been truly 'free' from English tyranny as everything seems to point towards them...and the corrupt Illuminati Free Mason Order.  Every year we seem to become more and more like China...

Finally, I believe the spiritual connection is that this idea of a corporation being a 'person' is a counterfeit of The Church (not to be confused with religious church institutions or self-anointed congregations), which is actually the body of Jesus Christ. Isn't it fitting that the Latin word for body, 'corpus', is where the term 'corporation' is derived  from?  However, in The Church individuals are still held accountable for their actions by government and society.  The individuals of corporations, however, seem to mostly get away with terrible treachery against its own employees, customers, and civilians under its influence.  The government has even been influenced to the degree that it now allows corporate abuse to take place without much repercussion at all...especially if a monetary value can be placed on the wrong doing.

In order to change this madness, the money system needs to changed, the system of law needs to be changed exclusively to Common Law as opposed to Admiralty Law, the statutes that protect corporations from wrongdoing must be dismantled, and those selected for government service need to enforce the law as well as be held accountable themselves by the people in order to protect the society rather than prey on it.

Different Worlds

It is quite amazing about how many different worlds there are.  And when I use the term 'worlds', I don't mean planets in the universe.   What I mean by worlds, is the societies of men.  I want to journal this thought...because I have found a different world to which I belong.   It is the Kingdom of Heaven;  the very body of Jesus Christ; the Church.

One should not, however, confuse this with church institutions which are many and wide here in the Bible belt state of Texas.  Many of such institutions are simply country clubs, personal ministry ventures, and at worst, cults under the guise of Christianity.  The term Churchianity should be more fitting for these types of institutions.

Outside of this however, are pervasive American cultures that I find are growing more and more evil every day.  For instance, the corporate/professional culture of the dollar.  This is where plenty of people clone themselves into the socially accepted world of high living, expensive recreation, and predatory dealings at the expense of others.  This world values 'classiness', arrogance, knowledge as long as it contributes to profit or controls others, finger pointing, brown nosing, and back-patting.  It despises sharing, compassion, superior effort and talent, differences, incompetence, and the upsetting of order.  As the late Heath Ledger said as the Joker, "Introduce a little anarchy..."

There is also the 'Hollywood Culture' of pleasure and entertainment.  This is where plenty of people clone themselves into the socially accepted world of stardom, self-exploitation, extravagance, and the unclean behaviors of drunkeness, lust, and perversion.  This world values fame, 'classiness', arrogance, folly, ignorance, and the extreme.  It despises purity, individual reality, 'blandness', everyday living, humility, and humbleness. "Maury!  Maury! Maury!  Maury!..."

The last world I'll speak of for now is that of Churchianity.  This world reeks of people who clone themselves to be part of a 'Christian' ministry where they do nothing except feel entertained, motivated, self-helped, and self-justified.  They value lies, conformity, submission, hypocrisy, the appearance of purity, piety, religious order, nostalgia, dominionism, sensationalism, and 'classiness'.  They hate admonishment, warnings, truth, service to the less fortunate, sharing with anyone who they feel doesn't deserve it, 'negativity', and righteousness.

The Unadulterated Truth

I  had purchased one of those cheap coffee table books at Barnes and Nobles called "This is Not a Book".  Obviously, it was a book...but author Dr. Michael Picard didn't want it to be a book apparently...I have no idea why unless he thinks it is some kind of clever philosophical trick...but regardless, it had some intriguing ideas and thoughts.

The first section of the book, which is the only part I happened to read, deals with the philosophical Etymology.  He therefore defines what knowledge is as the basis for the purpose of the book.  I found many of his definitions to be lacking and misguided...or, 'adulterated' if you will...so I wrote down a few of them in order to see if I could come up with some conceptual system using English language (which is obviously an important factor) to make a sort of mathematical 'proof' of Unadulterated Truth.

To begin, I think one has to start with the definition of 'truth'.   If you can't sufficiently define 'truth' then there is no point in continuing since that is exactly what this study seeks to find.  Even a historically prominent man of leadership...one Pontius Pilate...had no idea what 'truth' was, nor seemed to be concerned with it when speaking by the very person who is the manifestation of truth, Jesus Christ.  Obviously, my perspective of truth is a Biblical one but that is because that is the only thing I have found in my existence to be completely and infallibly true.  But, enough with the introduction, lets get to the definition of truth:


From http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/truth
1

a archaic : fidelity, constancyb : sincerity in action, character, and utterance

2

a (1) : the state of being the case : fact (2) : the body of real things, events, and facts : actuality (3) often capitalized : a transcendent fundamental or spiritual realityb : a judgment, proposition, or idea that is true or accepted as true <truths of thermodynamics>c : the body of true statements and propositions

3

a : the property (as of a statement) of being in accord with fact or realityb chiefly British : true 2c : fidelity to an original or to a standard

4

capitalized Christian Science : god

— in truth

: in accordance with fact : actually

I find Merriam Websters definitions, not unlike the English language, somewhat lacking and vague.  It does not surprise me since English itself is a language of swindlers and constructed to be as inoffensive as possible for the sake of influencing those that the nobility desired to conquer.  However, 2a2, 2b, and 3a would be the closest things dealing with the concept of truth for this study.

Here are my definitions of truth in contrast:

Truth:

1.  A reality that can be tested and justified.

2.  The person of Jesus Christ:  John 14:6 ..."I am the way the truth and the life;" (NASB)

Lets deal with definition 1 for now since it must be explained for the sake of the proof. 

A reality is something that actually exists.  We do also need the definition of 'existence' for that so:

Existence:

1.  The state of being.

The state of being can be thought of as something that meets the condition of being detectable, tangible, or accessible to human senses. A few examples of this would be like how a scent is something that is accessible to our sense of smell, a thought is something that is tangible to our mind/soul, and colors are something that our sight can detect (even though there are also very many that we can't detect without instruments).

To continue with the rest of the definition of 'truth', something tested can be measured and graded, while something justified can be accepted as proof that it is correct.  So truth, in essence, would be a reality that can be tested (measured/graded) and justified (proven).

Now, we need a few things to measure and grade the reality of truth as well as to prove it.  Thus, we need to define several other terms that deal with 'truth'.  In this journey I may be prone to edit, add, and possibly subtract from this list as I personally grow from this study.  Again, while I claim to be a philosopher I am not going to make the mistake that I know or understand everything that exists.  However, I can assuredly say that I know one who does. He is omniscient and it is my prayer that he assist me in this venture.  

So, without further ado, let us continue with the terms that deal with 'truth':

Belief:

The bias or knowledge that something is true or truth.  (Whether it is or is not, is irrelevant.)

Doubt:

A feeling, sensation, or general uncertainty that something isn't true. A relative measure of disbelief.

Fact:

A testable, absolute statement claiming to be truth.

Opinion:

A biased statement of belief relative to an individual's knowledge.

Awareness:

The conscious observation of, or, the conscious relation to, something's existence.

Assumption:

The belief that something is true yet without adequate knowledge or confidence to confirm it as true.

Knowledge:

The reality, belief, or awareness of things known and understood by an individual.

Ignorance:

The lack of knowledge and/or wisdom.


Enlightenment:
The relative belief that one has awareness far beyond ignorance.

Negligence:
The deliberate acceptance of ignorance.

Wisdom:

True reality as it relates to God (typically, truth that man discovers which leads to goodness, godliness, and/or joy, or, the avoiding of evil).

Good:

Something that which is approved of by God, society, or man (however, true 'good' must be ultimately approved by God since it is derived from the word 'God' and would thus need to truly be 'of' or 'from' God for it to be good.).

Evil:

1.  Something that is disapproved of by God.  

2.  The perversion or 'backwards living' of men or society.

3.  An amoral perspective towards life.

Absolute:
Something that is considered complete, perfect, pure, outright, whole, unrestricted, unlimited, all encompassing, and/or independent as far as value goes in conjunction with truth.

Relative:
Something that is dependent on an individual's, or group of individual's perspective.

Lie:
1.  Something claiming to be true, or thought of as true/truth, when in reality it is not.
2.  An act or statement of deception.
3.  A counterfeit of a reality.

...to be continued....